I ordered a thing from a place in the US some weeks ago. The parcel tracker has now reported it on three different continents, and two of those after it already reached my own country.

Or possibly the parcel tracker is not entirely correct, or maybe it's just misleading me. I don't know, but I sure don't understand physical packet routing either.

@liw A famous (apocryphal?) result says that you can avoid congestion by routing to a random node on the network, then to final destination.

@bremner Interesting. Would you happen to have a reference? (Serious question.)

@liw Not offhand. Maybe @11011110 knows whether this idea that routing to a random node in a network and then to the destination avoids congestion is really a theorem or just a folk tale.

@bremner @liw In the paper "Universal packet routing algorithms" (Leighton, Maggs, and Rao, FOCS 1988) they credit this idea to "Universal schemes for parallel communication" (Valiant and Brebner, STOC 1981).

@liw @bremner I always used to refer to this as the "hot potato algorithm" but searching now tells me that is not quite accurate. But the basic idea is that if a packet comes in one interface and does not have a local address, you simply throw it out another random interface and let the next router do the same.

(Like a hot potato thrown around a group.)

On a small network (with a high TTL) the packet will eventually get there and not require routers to have any knowledge of the wider network.

@liw sounds like the place is delivering via TOR

Awesome! Want! :)

#TORdelivery "even we don't know where it is"

Sign in to participate in the conversation

Lars and friends